Bias

From Fandom wank wiki

Here's what Wikipedia has to say about bias:

“	All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources.	”
	— {{{source}}}

It goes on to detail a lot more stuff that you can read if you want. It's ok, we'll wait.

The Fandom Wank Wiki also mentions bias. It says:

“	In many of the more relaxed civilizations on the Outer Eastern Rim of the Internet, the Fandom Wank Wiki has already supplanted the great Wikipedia as the standard repository of all knowledge and wisdom, for though it has many omissions and contains much that is apocryphal, or at least wildly inaccurate, it scores over the older, more pedestrian work in two important respects. First, it is slightly cheaper*; and secondly it has the words FANDOM WANK IS MY FANDOM inscribed in large friendly letters on its cover.**	”
	— {{{source}}}

The FW Wiki is written for wankas, by the wankas, and about the wankas (and wankers too). Don't panic! Most of the time grudgewanking will be avoided. But don't necessarily expect Wikipedia's neutral point of view.

^*but not as cheap as your girlfriend.***
^**totally plagiarized from Douglas Adams, of course.[1]
^***totally plagiarized from Warren Ellis, too.[2]