Cute Overload

From Fandom wank wiki

One would think that a website devoted to posting incredibly cute pictures of incredibly cute animals looking incredibly cute would be immune to wank.

One would, of course, be incredibly wrong.

[edit]

But At Least These Wanks Come With Really Cute Pictures!

"If donkeys wish to engage in consensual BDSM play, so be it. It's their right. I don't care what your bible says."[1]
MY CHILD SAW THIS AND IS NO LONGER INNOCENT![2]
How dare you give your cat a bath, you unfeeling bastard?[3]
Aww, it's a baby with a little kitty tail in its mouth. SWEET MOTHER OF GOD SOMEONE CALL PETA![4] (Comes with bonus i_wank![5])
This post does not contain the expected level of cute![6]
"I don't really want to say anything much about this, except that I *can* see how the 'Hitlercats' thing could be offensive/hurtful to the surviving folks who lived through the Holocaust."[7]
Damn you and your eco-terrorismistic kitty pictures![8]
Maybe those bunnies needed that pot for medicinal purposes, okay?[9]
You have the power to influence others to do the right thing, or to do the wrong thing. And posting pictures of Labradoodles is the WRONG THING![10]
If you're not disgusted by an adorable little pomeranian holding an adorable little baby chick in its mouth, then you're a poor excuse for an animal lover![11]
Putting a cockatiel with a kitten is like giving a toddler a gun![12]
Cute Overload is ~~friend to all children~~ enemy to all women![13]
Kittens in cleavage promotes acceptance of soft-core pornography![14]
Aww, what a cute little baby turkey. MMM MMM GOOD EATS![15]
CO proves once again that they have no idea what "NSFW" means.[16]
Man, they just cannot get over that whole "girls have boobies" thing, can they?[17]