Fanhistory Wiki
From Fandom wank wiki
Discoveries of the Fanhistory Wiki tend to follow this pattern:
- It's a wiki about everything in fandom; how cool is that?
- Wow; a lot of this stuff is wrong, and exactly the same information is copied into fifty different articles.
- Wait, why aren't more things cited?
- This is history?
- Okay, let's edit!
- WTF? Banned?
Fanhistory has no notability requirements. It also has very few citation requirements.
Just don't try to edit or delete anything. Especially not your real name.
Contents |
Why does some of the information look like the Fandom Wank Wiki?
The Fandom Wank Wiki was extensively mined for information by the Fanhistory Wiki.
The Fandom Wank Wiki: An excellent source for quality fandom research!
Just like LOL_Meme and the LOL_Meme wiki.[1]
Baffling solicitation of editors
The Fanhistory wiki apparently believes in achieving balanced articles by devoting equal space to different points of view. In practice, what that means that if 98% of people think you're clueless, your viewpoint is still very important fandom history.
During The Russet Doom Saga, LadySybilla was given an opportunity for equal representation! Naturally, she used this space to complain that everyone was allied in a conspiracy of stalking and harassment against her.
Similarly, Laura thought notorious racewanker Will Shetterly was an excellent choice to present an opposing point of view to GraveFail on her Wiki.[2]
Wanks
Surprisingly few.
Comments
More.
