Talk:Stormfreak Of The Night

From Fandom wank wiki

For what it's worth, I think a lot of the Zinkshipper edits to here and/or Stormfreak should be kept, as they do honestly fill in data. See my comments on User talk:Zinkshipper, but I know others are free to do what they like. --Mindset 05:44, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

Is it okay to revert this entry back to the earlier version, and add the "see Stormfreak" note at the bottom? --Young Murdered Faery 18:23, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

Don't know. You can try if you like. --Mindset 20:13, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

Moot point now. Oh well.--Young Murdered Faery 02:37, 18 January 2006 (GMT)

--

The trouble is that the data (a) takes away a lot of the folklore, rumors, & BS, and (b) makes the Fandom Wank staff look pretty wanky themselves. It's a pretty documented case of not being able to take what they dished out. (And well-written, if I do say so myself!) We can't have that, because Fandom Wank is the king of all things wanky (unless someone calls them ugly, because that is just CROSSING THE LINE, MISSY!). They can point and laugh at you, but you can't point and laugh back. (For my amusement, did ANYONE keep a copy of the Ten Commandments of Fandom Wank, which was the actual reason why Stormfreak was banned? It was before my time and I can't find them anywhere.)

And YES, I fully intend to add the rest of the original entry (such as all of SF's banned names) to the entry, as well as Stormfreak's documented hatred of all things Caucasian. I sure hope it's okay that I get some sleep first, some food maybe, and pay a few bills before I do. --Zinkshipper 05:44, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

It's a pretty documented case of not being able to take what they dished out.

You're the one who keeps claiming there's no documentation. *Shrug*

For my amusement, did ANYONE keep a copy of the Ten Commandments of Fandom Wank, which was the actual reason why Stormfreak was banned?

Again, links? Proof? You're the one who keeps claiming there's none of that, which is why you want to change the entry. Fair enough, but don't be as hypocritical as you're claiming everyone else is. --Snacky 17:21, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

Re the "Ten Commandments", wasn't it crossposted to stormfreaksucks? If not, no clue, probably lost to the Internet. --Mindset 20:13, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

--

I reverted it because I really didn't want this to be Stormfreak's personal breast-beating forum. There is a lot of background stuff in Zs's edits that can be useful *but* the grandstanding has got to go. -- Moonjaguar

--

As opposed to FW's breast-beating, I suppose? Look, it doesn't take a rocket science to figure out that the two camps will never see eye-to-eye on the events in question. But what have I posted that was so offensive that you felt the need to merely get rid of ALL of it, especially since so little of it can be debated? I didn't show up here claiming that SF was the second coming of Christ and all of her detractors were fat, greasy pieces of white trash who had sex with shampoo bottles (whatever that means). All I did was post (a) what was generally agreed on by Fandom Wank themselves, and (b) what I could find using the Wayback Machine. Most of the disagreement comes from stuff that can't even be proven one way or another, and to have the attitude of "well, this is just how we'll tell it anyway because it doesn't make us look so hypocritical" is just RETARDED. If SF is so bad that she must not be wanked (except for when you choose to wank her), then for heaven's sake, let's see some EVIDENCE of some of her kitten-killing, baby-eating evil. Anything less than that is just plain ol' grudgewank - and since it's happening in 2006 when the wank occured THREE YEARS AGO, that makes it extra sad. -- Zinkshipper

Look, it doesn't take a rocket science to figure out that the two camps will never see eye-to-eye on the events in question

Nope, which is why the edits you made are fine - two sides to the story and all that (although the racism stuff is bullshit, and should be gone).

If SF is so bad that she must not be wanked (except for when you choose to wank her), then for heaven's sake, let's see some EVIDENCE of some of her kitten-killing, baby-eating evil.

One more time, the reason she must not be wanked is because she's not allowed on the Journalfen site, having been banned by the admins. Their site, their rules. If someone wants to set up another wank community, off of Journalfen, they're certainly free to wank and discuss SF to their heart's content. As is happening right now, on this wiki, which is not on JF! :-)

Anything less than that is just plain ol' grudgewank - and since it's happening in 2006 when the wank occured THREE YEARS AGO, that makes it extra sad.

Yeah, that *is* grudgewank, IMO. I guess it's time for another reminder not to discuss her.--Snacky 17:34, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

Thing is, I'm not sure whoever posted the wank to otf_wank knew Stormfreak was involved. Unless you want to argue that the poster didn't make the connection. --Young Murdered Faery 18:23, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

No, I don't think the OP knew that. But Shoi pointed it out in the very first comment and discussion ensued from the there, which you know, is why I don't blame her for showing up, since everyone keeps talking about her.--Snacky 19:27, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

Yeah, there've been several wank posts re blackfolk, in which SF's current LJ name has commented, and nobody brought it up then. It was somewhat wince-inducing to see it the other day. --Mindset 20:13, 17 January 2006 (GMT)

Just a note--according to LiveJournal, the username "rattlerbrat" doesn't exist.

Seems she deleted it, possibly by accident while juggling sockpuppets. Can just add a note for the time being. ETA: though not by me since the oppressive fuckers here haven't seen fit to give me admin access, so I can't change protected pages. I'm sure someone will be along eventually after they're done wanking. -- Wankprophet

Er...no, I never deleted my LiveJournal. I merely changed the name. But thanks for asking. MagentaThompson 13:01, 15 August 2006 (BST)

Note added. -- Avocado 08:27, 8 May 2006 (BST)

Also appearing as jade_logan, as seen here...I think. --Barbariansheep 12:10, 22 November 2006 (CST)

Confirming that. And with magentathompson being dead (KRI!), Loomis Simmons is born! - Loomis Simmons 06:53, 12 December 2006 (GMT)